Enhancing Growth, Yield, and Forage Quality of Two Teosinte Genotypes Through NPK Nano-Fertilizer Application

Authors

  • Abd ElAziz T. Bondok Forage Crops Research Department, Field Crops Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egyp
  • Khalil Saad-Allah Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1679-5656

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56946/jspae.v3i2.527

Keywords:

Chemical fertilizers, forage quality, growth performance, nanoparticles, NPK fertilizer, teosinte

Abstract

The overuse of synthetic fertilizers in agriculture has led to adverse effects on soil health, groundwater contamination, and the overall environmental sustainability of farming systems. Consequently, there is an urgent need for more innovative and environmentally friendly fertilizer approaches that can enhance agricultural productivity without compromising soil quality. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impact of different fertilizer compositions, including conventional chemical fertilizers and nano nitrogen-phosphorous-potassium (NPK) fertilizers, on the growth, yield, and forage quality of two teosinte genotypes (G3 and G4) to identify more sustainable alternatives that could improve agricultural outcomes while minimizing environmental harm. A split-plot design field investigation with the main plots representing the teosinte genotypes and the sub-plots comprising five fertilizer formulations was conducted over two growing seasons (2021 and 2022) to investigate their effects on vegetative growth, yield attributes, and forage quality of two teosinte genotypes. The two teosinte genotypes were subjected to various fertilizer treatments (100% chemical fertilizers (CF) (F1), 75% CF + 25% nano NPK (F2), 50% CF + 50% nano NPK (F3), 25% CF + 75% nano NPK (F4), and 100% nano NPK (F5). Results indicated that G4 exhibited superior growth and nutritional composition compared to G3. Furthermore, F3 treatment resulted in enhancing shoot height, stem diameter, and dry matter accumulation. Additionally, F3 treatment improved fiber digestibility, but F1 treatment yielded the highest crude protein (CP). These findings suggest that integrating nano-fertilizers with traditional fertilizers, as exemplified by the F3 mixture, holds potential for optimizing teosinte growth and forage quality. In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of the research exploration of balanced fertilizer mixtures to enhance forage yield and quality in teosinte cultivation, advocating for a strategic integration of nano NPK and bulk chemical fertilizers for sustainable agricultural practices.

References

Abdelsalam, I.M., Ghosh, S., AlKafaas, S.S., Bedair, H., Malloum, A., ElKafas, S.S. and Saad-Allah, K.M. Nanotechnology as a tool for abiotic stress mitigation in horticultural crops. Biologia. (2023). 78(1), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-022-01251-z

Abdulraheem, M.I., Xiong, Y., Moshood, A.Y., Cadenas-Pliego, G., Zhang, H. and Hu, J. Mechanisms of plant epigenetic regulation in response to plant stress: Recent discoveries and implications. Plants. (2024). 13(2), e163. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants13020163

Agarwal, G., Kudapa, H., Ramalingam, A., Choudhary, D., Sinha, P., Garg, V., Singh, V.K. Epigenetics and epigenomics: underlying mechanisms, relevance, and implications in crop improvement. Functional and Integrative Genomics. (2020). 20(6), 739–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-020-00756-7

Ali, I., He, L., Ullah, S., Quan, Z., Wei, S., Iqbal, A., Ligeng, J. Biochar addition coupled with nitrogen fertilization impacts on soil quality, crop productivity, and nitrogen uptake under double‐cropping system. Food and Energy Security, (2020). 9(3), e208. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.208

Ali, I., Yuan, P., Ullah, S., Iqbal, A., Zhao, Q., Liang, H., Jiang, L. Biochar amendment and nitrogen fertilizer contribute to the changes in soil properties and microbial communities in a paddy field. Frontiers in microbiology, (2022). 13, 834751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.834751

AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 19th ed. Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (2012).

Babu, S., Singh, R., Yadav, D., Rathore, S.S., Raj, R., Avasthe, R., Yadav, S.K. Nanofertilizers for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Chemosphere. (2022). 292, e133451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133451

Benzon, H.R.L., Rubenecia, M.R.U., Ultra Jr, V.U. and Lee, S.C. Nano-fertilizer affects the growth, development, and chemical properties of rice. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research. (2015). 7(1), 105–117.

Bondok, A.T., Mousa, W.M., Rady, A.M. and Saad-Allah, K.M. Phenotypical, physiological and molecular assessment of drought tolerance of five Egyptian teosinte genotypes. Journal of Plant Interactions. (2022). 17(1), 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2022.2085335

Channab, B.-E., EL Idrissi, A., Ammar, A., Dardari, O., Marrane, S.E., el Gharrak, A., Akil, A. Recent advances in nano-fertilizers: synthesis, crop yield impact, and economic analysis. Nanoscale. (2024). 16(9), 4484–4513.

Dar, F.A., Mushtaq, N.U., Saleem, S., Rehman, R.U., Dar, T.U.H. and Hakeem, K.R. Role of epigenetics in modulating phenotypic plasticity against abiotic stresses in plants. International Journal of Genomics. (2022). 2022(1), e1092894. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1092894

Devkota, N.R., Pokharel, P., Paudel, L.N., Upreti, C.R. and Joshi, N.P. Performance of teosinte (Euchlaena mexicana) as a promising summer-forage crop with respect to location and sowing dates considering the scenario of possible climate change in Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Agricultural Sciences. (2015).13, 131–141.

El-Saadony, M.T., ALmoshadak, A.S., Shafi, M.E., Albaqami, N.M., Saad, A.M., El-Tahan, A.M. and Desoky, E.-S.M. Vital roles of sustainable nano-fertilizers in improving plant quality and quantity-an updated review. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. (2021). 28(12), 7349–7359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.032

Garg, D., Sridhar, K., Stephen Inbaraj, B., Chawla, P., Tripathi, M. and Sharma, M. Nano-biofertilizer formulations for agriculture: a systematic review on recent advances and prospective applications. Bioengineering. (2023). 10(9), e1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091010

González, J. de J.S., Corral, J.A.R., García, G.M., Ojeda, G.R., Larios, L.D. la C., Holland, J.B. and Medrano, R.M. Ecogeography of teosinte. PLOS ONE. (2018). 13(2), e0192676. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192676

Haydar, M.S., Ghosh, D. and Roy, S. Slow and controlled release nanofertilizers as an efficient tool for sustainable agriculture: Recent understanding and concerns. Plant Nano Biology. (2024). 7, e100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plana.2024.100058

Helaly, A., Ashmawi, A.E., Mohammed, A.A., El- Abd, M.T. and Nofal, A.S. Effect of soil application of nano NPK fertilizers on growth, productivity and quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Al-Azhar Journal of Agricultural Research. (2021). 46(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajar.2021.218559

Iqbal, M., Umar, S. and Mahmooduzzafar. Nano-fertilization to enhance nutrient use efficiency and productivity of crop plants’. In A. Husen & M. Iqbal, eds. Nanomaterials and plant potential. Cham: Springer International Publishing. (2019). pp. 473–505.

Kopittke, P.M., Lombi, E., Wang, P., Schjoerring, J.K. and Husted, S. Nanomaterials as fertilizers for improving plant mineral nutrition and environmental outcomes. Environmental Science: Nano. (2019). 6(12), 3513–3524.

Payghan, H. Effects of organic, chemical and nano-biological fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative charachteristics of millet (Panicum miliaceum) varieties. (2016). University of Zabol.

Qureshi, A., Singh, D.K. and Dwivedi, S. Nano-fertilizers: a novel way for enhancing nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. (2018). 7(2), 3325–3335. https://doi.org/10.1145/3916.3986

Reddy, M.K., Asthana, R., Debnath, S., Ray, P., Mandal, N., Arunachalam, A. and Koduru, J.R. Nanofertilizers for sustainable crop production: A comprehensive review. BioNanoScience. (2024). 14(2), 1918–1939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12668-024-01413-0

Reshma Anjum, M., Maheswari, J., Anusha, K., Sravya, B., Narasimha, G. and Abd-Elsalam, K.A. Maximizing crop yield with macro and micro nano enhanced fertilizers’. In K. A. Abd-Elsalam & M. A. Alghuthaymi, eds. Nanofertilizers for sustainable agroecosystems: recent advances and future trends. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. (2024). pp. 1–33.

Rivera-Rodríguez, D.M., Mastretta-Yanes, A., Wegier, A., De la Cruz Larios, L., Santacruz-Ruvalcaba, F., Corral, J.A.R. and Hernández, B. Genomic diversity and population structure of teosinte (Zea spp.) and its conservation implications’. PLoS ONE. (2023). 18(10), e0291944. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291944

Sahoo, S., Adhikari, S., Joshi, A. and Singh, N.K. Use of wild progenitor teosinte in maize (Zea mays subsp. mays) improvement: present status and future prospects. Tropical Plant Biology. (2021). 14(2): 156–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-021-09288-1

Salarizadeh, S. and Kavousi, H.R. Application of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) to detect the genotoxic effect of cadmium on tow iranian ecotypes of cumin (Cuminum cyminum). Journal of Cell and Molecular Research. (2015). 7(1), 38–46.

Sánchez, G.J.J., De La Cruz, L.L., Vidal, M.V.A., Ron, P.J., Taba, S., Santacruz-Ruvalcaba, F. and Sood, S. Three new teosintes (Zea spp., Poaceae) from México. American Journal of Botany. (2011). 98(9), 1537–1548. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100193

Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. (1991). 74(10), 3583–3597.

Sriperm, N., Pesti, G.M. and Tillman, P.B. Evaluation of the fixed nitrogen-to-protein (N:P) conversion factor (6.25) versus ingredient specific N:P conversion factors in feedstuffs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. (2011). 91(7), 1182–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4292

Srivastav, A.L. Chemical fertilizers and pesticides: role in groundwater contamination. In M. N. V. Prasad, ed. Agrochemicals Detection, Treatment and Remediation. Butterworth-Heinemann. (2020). pp. 143–159.

Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach. 2nd ed. Tokyo, Japan: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd. (1980).

Yadav, A., Yadav, K. and Abd-Elsalam, K.A. Nanofertilizers: types, delivery and advantages in agricultural sustainability. Agrochemicals. (2023). 2(2), 296–336. https://doi.org/10.3390/agrochemicals2020019

Yang, C.J., Samayoa, L.F., Bradbury, P.J., Olukolu, B.A., Xue, W., York, A.M. and Tuholski, M.R. The genetic architecture of teosinte catalyzed and constrained maize domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (2019). 116(12), 5643–5652. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820997116

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-12-02
CITATION
DOI: 10.56946/jspae.v3i2.527

How to Cite

Bondok, A. E. T., & Saad-Allah, K. (2024). Enhancing Growth, Yield, and Forage Quality of Two Teosinte Genotypes Through NPK Nano-Fertilizer Application. Journal of Soil, Plant and Environment, 3(2), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.56946/jspae.v3i2.527

Issue

Section

Article